NEW DELHI: A series of dramatic intelligence inputs by various agencies from along the India-Pakistan border has raised troubling questions if untrustworthy sources are feeding fantastic stories for a payment.
According to at least two sources in the security establishment, the Intelligence Bureau and the Military Intelligence, in the third week of January, filed similar narratives about the January 8 beheading of Lance Naik Hemraj. The strikingly similar reports, sources said, came from their humint ( human intelligence).
A senior official who has been involved in intelligence for a few decades said they suspect that both the agencies were fed by the same source. "This is not an isolated incident. We have been seeing a pattern," he said, citing the instance of a much publicized report last year about five terrorists coming to Mumbai for attacks. The photos released to the public turned out to be that of Lahore traders.
Around the time of the beheading incident, at least three different agencies, including the BSF and Military Intelligence, separately reported that Lashkar-e-Taiba chief Hafiz Saeed had visited Tattapani across Poonch and extorted action against Indian troops. Again, the inputs were assessed to be of extremely low dependability.
"It has become a regular affair along the border, especially the LoC. We are seeing a pattern. I think these so-called sources are raking in money feeding various agencies. Most of the information is patently false," another senior official said.
The kind of unverified information being fed to Indian agencies is starkly visible in the kind of inputs that has been flowing into New Delhi from the Poonch-Mendhar area in recent years. One Subedar Jabbar Khan, who is also called Sabar Khan, has been heading the ISI detachment in Tattapani for several years now, if these inputs are to go by. Col Siddiqui, who according to these intelligence reports paid Rs 5 lakh for the beheading, has been there for at least five years. Both the facts, that ISI officials would have such a long posting along the border, is adding to further questions about the credibility of these inputs.
A third source said questions over the unreliable inputs have been troubling the security establishment for many years now. In May 2012, Indian agencies were taken for a ride by an input that came through the Research and Analysis Wing about a team of terrorists who had landed in India for an attack in Mumbai. Later, it turned out that the photos of the so-called terrorists were that of traders in Lahore.
Worse, sources said the information was fed to RAW by a man who pretended to be a close relative of a senior LeT leader.
In the face of such frequent recurrences, many are saying that the intelligence agencies need to introduce a verifiable source payment mechanism. Meaning, each source that is paid by a field operative should be verifiable by the agency top brass, which is the system in most developed countries. Indian intelligence field operatives have all the discretion for payments and their sources are a closely guarded secret. There is no scientific assessment of source dependability nor payment mechanisms.
The situation is worse along the border, where there is jostling among the several intelligence agencies to collect information from Pakistan. So a flourishing intelligence industry has sprung up, with many sources. Some of these sources are smugglers who frequently cross borders, and most others are residents of villages along the border. In a large number of cases, they are just feeding the information that Indian agencies want to hear and not always the truth, many here suspect.
Unreliable sources may be taking intelligence agencies for a ride
This article
Unreliable sources may be taking intelligence agencies for a ride
can be opened in url
http://newsaudiology.blogspot.com/2013/02/unreliable-sources-may-be-taking.html
Unreliable sources may be taking intelligence agencies for a ride
